Monday, July 10, 2006

Does Soccer Cause International Peace?

Daniel Drezner, who blogs at www.danieldrezner.com/blog, is starting his new job as an associate professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy this fall. Drezner had an intriguing piece up at the Washington Post early last month on "The Soccer Wars." Citing Bono's suggestion that World Cup soccer had the power to end an international conflict, Drezner asks: "Does the World Cup really put a stop to war?" Here's some flavor:

There are certainly tangible examples of soccer soothing the savage beast of war. What did the British and Germans do during the famous 1914 Christmas truce across the trenches during World War I? They played a soccer match (the Germans won, 3-2). During the peak of popularity for Brazilian soccer phenom Pele, the combatants in the Biafran war in Nigeria declared a two-day truce so they could watch him play. Of course, in both cases, the cessation of conflict was only temporary.

Soccer has also functioned as a useful outlet for postwar grievances. For generations after World War II, the conflict resonated in soccer matches between the Netherlands and Germany. Franklin Foer, editor of the New Republic and author of "How Soccer Explains the World," argues that the Dutch did not fully recover from the war until Dutchman Frank Rijkaard spit on Rudi Voller's mullet during a 1990 second-round World Cup match. Rijkaard's loogie was the only shot fired in restoring Dutch pride.

Successful teams have also provided the occasional boost for national comity. The Ivory Coast example cited in the ESPN ad works here. Since 1999, the country has been mired in coups, rebellions and ethnic conflicts. When the national team -- the Elephants -- qualified in October 2005, the head of the Ivory Coast Football Federation pleaded with President Laurent Gbagbo to restart peace talks. Elections are scheduled for October of this year. While a truce is in place, however, Human Rights Watch warned in May that both government and rebel forces were devoting their energies to terrorizing civilians.

The problem is that historically, soccer has been just as likely to be the trigger for war as the trigger for peace. The best-known example took place in June 1969 between El Salvador and Honduras. Immigration and border disputes between the two countries had reached a boiling point at the same time that a three-game elimination match between the two national teams was taking place. Rioting during the second game led the two countries to break diplomatic relations. Two weeks later, the 100-hour Soccer War took place, resulting in about 2,000 casualties.

Soccer also played a role in the run-up to the Balkan wars of the 1990s. In March 1990, Red Star Belgrade, a Serbian team, faced Dinamo Zagreb, a Croatian team, in the Croatian capital for a league title, a scant two weeks after Croatia elected nationalist Franjo Tudjman as president. According to Foer, that day was the first time in a half-century that Serbs and Croats openly fought each other. Red Star and Dinamo fans became so violent that the Serbian team had to be taken away by helicopter. Fifteen years after the match, the Zagreb daily Vecernji list observed, "The game that was never played will be remembered, at least by the soccer fans, as the beginning of the Patriotic War, and almost all of the contemporaries will declare it the key in understanding the Croatian cause." The leader of Red Star's ultranationalist fans -- the Delije -- was the notorious Arkan. He later recruited from the Delije to form the paramilitary force that engaged in ethnic cleansing of Croats and Muslims during the war, and ultimately was the victim of a gangland-style killing.

While success at the World Cup can bolster national pride, losing can reap the whirlwind. A working paper by business professors Alex Edmans, Diego Garcia and Oyvind Norli finds that "losses in soccer matches have an economically and statistically significant negative effect on the losing country's stock market." Some individual players suffer consequences worse than that. Colombian defender Andres Escobar, responsible for an own goal in a 1994 World Cup loss to the United States, was killed upon returning to his hometown of Medellin.

Soccer will never bring about peace on its own. The flip side is also true -- by itself, soccer cannot start a war. The World Cup, like the Olympics, suffers from a case of overblown rhetoric. Bono's assurances to the contrary, the passions inspired by the World Cup embody both the best and worst forms of nationalism.
Check here for more information on the El Savador-Honduras "Soccer War", which Drezner notes is probably the best contradictory example for the soccer-causes-peace thesis. In any case, as yesterday's World Cup final illustrated, there's certainly a lot of dramatic violence on the field, for example, Zinedine Zedane's ill-considered head-butt in the France-Italy title match.

3 comments:

The Wager Witch said...

Dunno if world cup brings about peace - but it's been certainly fun to watch everyone wager on it! LOL!


Wager Witch - http://wagerwitch.blogspot.com
Free No Deposit Casino Bonuses, Casino Promotions, Repeat Deposit Deals, Savvy Gambling Advice and more!

Donald Douglas said...

Thanks for visiting!

The Wager Witch said...

You're very welcome - I've been watching your blog through the click exchanges.

Been fun reading your opinions and stuff.

Have a splendid day!

Wager Witch - http://wagerwitch.blogspot.com
Free No Deposit Casino Bonuses, Casino Promotions, Repeat Deposit Deals, Savvy Gambling Advice and more!